ARR Dashboard

Submission Statistics

Total Submissions:

0

Withdrawn Submissions:

0

*Includes submissions withdrawn after receiving all reviews.

Desk Rejected Submissions:

0

Opted-in Anonymous Preprints:

0

Disclosed Preprints (ArXiv):

0

Resubmissions:

0

Reviewer Reassignment Requests:

0

Reviewer Statistics

Area Chair Pool Size:

0

Area Chairs Assigned:

0

Area Chairs Paper Load:

Reviewer Pool Size:

0

Reviewers Assigned:

0

Reviewers Paper Load:

Review Statistics

Paper Progress:

0%

(Papers with 3 or more reviews)

Meta Review Progress:

0%

Flagged for Ethics Review:

0

Score distributions

(Scores are rounded to the nearest 0.5. '0' score means that there is no score assigned yet.)

Review Turnaround Times

* To avoid biasing reviewers, score statistics will be disabled when an iteration is in progress

Reviewers Serving the Cycle

We would like to highlight the importance of quality reviews in the ACL rolling review process. If a review is deemed strong, decisive, helpful, and well-written by Area Chairs, it will be marked as a Great Review. Please note that a review not marked as great does not imply that it is poor; rather, it may simply not meet the exceptional standards set for this designation. Thank you for your continued contributions to the review process. Your efforts are invaluable in maintaining the quality and integrity of our evaluations.

Name	Institution	Papers Reviewed	Great Reviews	% Great Reviews